Human bedside evaluation versus automatic responsiveness testing in epilepsy (ARTiE)

Artie Ziff

Generalization versus contextualization in automatic evaluation.

Research has shown that automatic evaluations can be highly robust and difficult to change, highly malleable and easy to change, and highly context dependent. We tested a representational account of these disparate findings, which specifies the conditions under which automatic evaluations reflect (a) initially acquired information, (b) subsequently acquired, counterattitudinal information, or (...

Automatic Versus Human Navigation in Information Networks

People regularly face tasks that can be understood as navigation in information networks, where the goal is to find a path between two given nodes. In many such situations, the navigator only gets local access to the node currently under inspection and its immediate neighbors. This lack of global information about the network notwithstanding, humans tend to be good at finding short paths, despi...

Visual Programming versus Textual Programming in Automatic Testing and Diagnosis

The present paper investigates the categories of fbnctionality implemented by software in Automatic Test Systems and the programming paradigms that are commonly used for implementation. Building on the conclusions of this analysis, the paper proposes a combined development paradigm, where visual programming is used at diagnosis level, while both textual and visual languages are supported for im...

O12: Presurgical Evaluation in Pediatric Epilepsy Surgery

لطفاً به چکیده انگلیسی مراجعه شود.